%% You should probably cite draft-fossati-tls-ext-header-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{fossati-tls-ext-header-00,
	number =	{draft-fossati-tls-ext-header-00},
	type =		{Internet-Draft},
	institution =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	publisher =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	note =		{Work in Progress},
	url =		{https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fossati-tls-ext-header-00},
        author =	{Thomas Fossati and Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos},
	title =		{{Record Header Extensions for TLS and DTLS}},
	pagetotal =	7,
	year =		,
	month =		,
	day =		,
	abstract =	{This document proposes a mechanism to extend the record header in TLS and DTLS. To that aim, the (D)TLS header is modified as follows: the length field is trimmed to 15 bits, and the length's top bit is given the "record header extension indicator" semantics, allowing a sender to signal that one or more record header extensions have been added to this record. We define the generic format of a record header extension and the general rules associated with its handling. Any details regarding syntax, semantics and negotiation of a specific record header extension, are left to future documents.},
}