Skip to main content

Basic Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Packages
draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-10

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-01-05
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-01-05
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-06-26
10 Allison Mankin
IESG Note

  This document is being published for the information of the community.  It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being deployed in …
IESG Note

  This document is being published for the information of the community.  It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being deployed in a number of products.  Implementers should be  aware of RFC 3015, which was developed in the IETF Megaco Working Group and the ITU-T SG16 and which is considered by the IETF and ITU-T to be the standards-based (including reviewed security considerations) way to meet the needs that MGCP was designed to address.  The IETF Megaco working group and the ITU-T Study Group 16 are developing extensions to RFC 3015 for functions of the type addressed in this document.
2003-06-26
10 Allison Mankin State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement to be sent by Mankin, Allison
2003-06-13
10 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent  :: Point Raised - writeup needed by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-06-13
10 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent  :: Point Raised - writeup needed from Approved-announcement to be sent by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-06-13
10 Jacqueline Hargest State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Hargest, Jacqueline
2003-06-12
10 (System) IESG has approved the document
2003-06-05
10 Allison Mankin
This was on the agenda before and I held it because of concerns over its use of IETF protocols - I want to clear it …
This was on the agenda before and I held it because of concerns over its use of IETF protocols - I want to clear it and have it approved with an IESG note, having completed review.
2003-06-02
10 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Mankin, Allison
2003-03-06
10 Scott Bradner 2003-03-06 - discussed on IESG call
Alliosn wants to set up a way to do a formal review of MGCP
documents
2003-03-06
10 Scott Bradner Shepherding AD has been changed to Mankin, Allison from Bradner, Scott
2003-03-06
10 Scott Bradner State Changes to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by Bradner, Scott
2003-02-28
10 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-10.txt
2003-01-12
10 Scott Bradner
2002-01-09 - discussed on IESG call
but discussion not finished
potential issues with jitter processing and congestion control
on agenda for next call to finish …
2002-01-09 - discussed on IESG call
but discussion not finished
potential issues with jitter processing and congestion control
on agenda for next call to finish discussion
2002-12-27
10 Scott Bradner 2002-12-26 - allison has issues - but not on call
doc will be on next agenda
2002-12-11
10 Scott Bradner 2002-12-11 - put on IESG agenda
2002-12-11
10 Scott Bradner State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested  :: Revised ID Needed by Bradner, Scott
2002-12-11
10 Scott Bradner 2002-12-11 - noticed that a new version was published
2002-11-04
09 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-09.txt
2002-10-13
10 Scott Bradner
2002-10-13 - note to authors

I've been asked to review draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages  for the IESG

this document is missing a Security Considerations section (which
all …
2002-10-13 - note to authors

I've been asked to review draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages  for the IESG

this document is missing a Security Considerations section (which
all RFCs must have)

it would also be useful to split the references into normative and
no-normative sections

please add a paragraph like the following early in the introduction

IESG Note

  This document is being published for the information of the
  community.  It describes a non-IETF protocol that is currently being
  deployed in a number of products.  Implementers should be aware that
  the IETF Megaco working group and the ITU-T Study Group 16 have
  produced a standards track RFC "Megaco Protocol Version 1.0" (RFC
  3015
, also published as ITU recommendation H.248) which addresses the
  same problem space and are developing extensions to that protocol for
  functions of this type.

of, if you would rather, the IESG can ask the RFC Editor to add
the paragraph
2002-10-13
10 Scott Bradner by sob
2002-10-13
10 Scott Bradner State Changes to Publication Requested  -- New ID Needed from Publication Requested by sob
2002-10-10
10 Stephen Coya Draft Added by scoya
2002-09-23
08 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-08.txt
2002-08-28
07 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-07.txt
2002-07-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-06.txt
2002-07-24
05 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-05.txt
2002-04-26
04 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-04.txt
2002-02-01
03 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-03.txt
2001-08-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-02.txt
2001-07-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-01.txt
2001-01-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-foster-mgcp-basic-packages-00.txt