RSVP-TE extensions for services aware MPLS
draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Qilei Wang , Malcolm Betts , Vishwas Manral , Xihua Fu , Dave McDysan , Andrew G. Malis | ||
| Last updated | 2012-05-16 (Latest revision 2011-11-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
With more and more enterprises using cloud based services, the distances between the user and the applications are growing. For multiple applications such as High Performance Computing and Electronic Financial markets, the response times are critical as is packet loss, while other applications require more throughput. For example, financial or trading companies are very focused on end-to- end private pipe line latency optimizations that improve things 2-3 ms. Latency and latency SLA is one of the key parameters that these "high value" customers use to select a private pipe line provider. This document extends RSVP-TE protocol to promote SLA experince of latency and packet loss application.
Authors
Qilei Wang
Malcolm Betts
Vishwas Manral
Xihua Fu
Dave McDysan
Andrew G. Malis
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)