%% You should probably cite draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-02 instead of this revision.
@techreport{fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-01,
    number =    {draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext/01/},
    author =    {Qilei Wang and Malcolm Betts and Vishwas Manral and Xihua Fu and Dave McDysan and Andrew G. Malis},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE extensions for services aware MPLS}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2011,
    month =     nov,
    day =       13,
    abstract =  {With more and more enterprises using cloud based services, the distances between the user and the applications are growing. For multiple applications such as High Performance Computing and Electronic Financial markets, the response times are critical as is packet loss, while other applications require more throughput. For example, financial or trading companies are very focused on end-to- end private pipe line latency optimizations that improve things 2-3 ms. Latency and latency SLA is one of the key parameters that these "high value" customers use to select a private pipe line provider. This document extends RSVP-TE protocol to promote SLA experince of latency and packet loss application.},
}