RSVP-TE extensions for Loss and Delay Traffic Engineering
draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Xihua Fu , Malcolm Betts , Qilei Wang , Dave McDysan , Andrew G. Malis , Vishwas Manral | ||
| Last updated | 2013-04-25 (Latest revision 2012-10-22) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
With more and more enterprises using cloud based services, the distances between the user and the applications are growing. For multiple applications such as High Performance Computing and Electronic Financial markets, the response times are critical as is packet loss, while other applications require more throughput. For example, financial or trading companies are very focused on end-to- end private pipe line delay optimizations that improve things 2-3 ms. Delay, jitter, loss and SLA (Service Level Agreement) are key parameters that these "high value" customers use to select a private pipe line provider. This document extends RSVP-TE protocol to promote SLA experince of delay and packet loss application.
Authors
Xihua Fu
Malcolm Betts
Qilei Wang
Dave McDysan
Andrew G. Malis
Vishwas Manral
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)