%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc instead of this I-D.
@techreport{gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04,
    number =    {draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp/04/},
    author =    {Rakesh Gandhi and Zafar Ali and Gabriele Galimberti and Xian Zhang},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2014,
    month =     apr,
    day =       23,
    abstract =  {In transport networks, there are requirements where Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) end-to-end recovery scheme needs to employ restoration Label Switched Path (LSP) while keeping resources for the working and/or protecting LSPs reserved in the network after the failure. This document reviews how the LSP association is to be provided using Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling in the context of GMPLS end-to-end recovery when using restoration LSP where failed LSP is not torn down. No new procedures or mechanisms are defined by this document, and it is strictly informative in nature.},
}