%% You should probably cite draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir instead of this I-D.
@techreport{gandhi-shah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-00,
    number =    {draft-gandhi-shah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-shah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir/00/},
    author =    {Rakesh Gandhi and Himanshu C. Shah and Jeremy Whittaker},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE Extensions For Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2016,
    month =     jan,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {In transport networks, there are requirements where reverse unidirectional LSP of a bidirectional LSP needs to follow the same path as its forward unidirectional LSP. This document describes how RSVP Extended ASSOCIATION Object can be used to bind two co-routed point-to-point unidirectional LSPs into an associated co-routed bidirectional LSP in single-sided provisioning case. The RSVP REVERSE\_LSP Object is used to enable an endpoint to trigger creation of the reverse LSP along the same path as the forward LSP. Fast-reroute procedures to ensure that the traffic flows on the co- routed path after a failure event are also described.},
}