NVO3 Gap Analysis - Requirements Versus Available Technology Choices
draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Eric Gray , Dr. Nabil N. Bitar , Xiaoming Chen, Marc Lasserre , Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) | ||
Last updated | 2013-09-26 (Latest revision 2013-07-15) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document evaluates candidate protocols against the NVO3 requirements. Gaps are identified and further work recommended.
Authors
Eric Gray
Dr. Nabil N. Bitar
Xiaoming Chen
Marc Lasserre
Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)