Requirements and approaches to combine Traffic Engineering and Segment Routing
draft-geib-spring-te-discussion-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ruediger Geib , Martin Horneffer , Stefan Schnitter , Martin Franzke | ||
| Last updated | 2015-04-20 (Latest revision 2014-10-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
MPLS Traffic engineering heavily relies on the correct simulation of traffic under normal and failure conditions. Currently traffic simulations rely on RSVP TE or on SPF routing with ECMP. SR introduces basically a new overlay on top of the L3 topology, the SR topology. The SR-topology is demand dependant. This document discusses issues, requirements and some solution approaches to combine Segment Routing and Traffic Engineering.
Authors
Ruediger Geib
Martin Horneffer
Stefan Schnitter
Martin Franzke
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)