%% You should probably cite draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-04 instead of this revision.
@techreport{gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-02,
    number =    {draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr/02/},
    author =    {Joe Gersch and Dan Massey and Eric Osterweil},
    title =     {{Reverse DNS Naming Convention for CIDR Address Blocks}},
    pagetotal = 24,
    year =      2012,
    month =     may,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {The reverse DNS naming method is used to specify a complete IP address. At present there is no standard way for the reverse DNS to handle address ranges. As an example, there is no formal mechanism to define a reverse DNS name for the block of addresses specified by the IPv4 prefix 129.82.0.0/16. Defining such a reverse DNS naming convention would be useful for a number of applications. This draft proposes a naming convention for encoding CIDR address blocks into the reverse DNS namespace.},
}