%% You should probably cite draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-04 instead of this revision.
@techreport{gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-03,
	number =	{draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-03},
	type =		{Internet-Draft},
	institution =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	publisher =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	note =		{Work in Progress},
	url =		{https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-03},
        author =	{Joe Gersch and Dan Massey and Eric Osterweil and Cathie Olschanowsky},
	title =		{{Reverse DNS Naming Convention for CIDR Address Blocks}},
	pagetotal =	31,
	year =		,
	month =		,
	day =		,
	abstract =	{This draft proposes a naming convention for encoding CIDR address blocks into the reverse DNS namespace. The reverse DNS naming method is commonly used to specify a complete IP address. This document describes how to encode an IPv4 or IPv6 CIDR address block such as 129.82.0.0/16. By defining a common naming convention, one can associate information with a prefix. The convention builds on past work in RFC 1101 that associates network names with prefixes. However, this previous work pre-dated the introduction of CIDR and has several critical ambiguities. This convention corrects the ambiguities and enables new applications ranging from routing information to geolocation.},
}