POTS, GETS,MLPP call comparison
draft-goldman-ieprep-comparison-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Stuart Goldman | ||
| Last updated | 2005-10-21 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides a high level conceptual discussion on the significant modeling differences affecting the treatment of a POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) call, a GETS (Government Emergency Telephone Service) call, and an MLPP (Multilevel Priority and Preemption) call in the traditional voice PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network). The genesis for this discussion on these services is primarily from experience with the United States capabilities and it is appreciated that these types of calls may be very different or non-existent in other regions of the world. Still, it may be useful to provide this discussion as a background, which may be useful in understanding the legacy operations as the chartered ieprep work progresses. It should be made clear from the onset that this document suggests no requirements or solutions, but is merely informative about the tradition voice network treatments.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)