%% You should probably cite draft-gont-6man-rfc6564bis-01 instead of this revision. @techreport{gont-6man-rfc6564bis-00, number = {draft-gont-6man-rfc6564bis-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-6man-rfc6564bis/00/}, author = {Fernando Gont and Will (Shucheng) LIU and Suresh Krishnan and Hagen Paul Pfeifer}, title = {{IPv6 Universal Extension Header}}, pagetotal = 8, year = 2014, month = apr, day = 8, abstract = {In IPv6, optional internet-layer information is encoded in separate headers that may be placed between the IPv6 header and the transport- layer header. There are a small number of such extension headers currently defined. This document describes the issues that can arise when defining new extension headers and specifies a new IPv6 Extension Header - the Universal Extension Header - that overcomes the aforementioned problem, while enabling the extensibility of IPv6. Finally, this document formally obsoletes RFC 6564.}, }