Skip to main content

Gravit Epistemic Verification Protocol (GEVP)
draft-gravit-gevp-06

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Dr. Alex Konviser
Last updated 2026-08-05
Replaces draft-gravit-vcp
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Additional resources GitHub Organization
GitHub Repository
Additional Web Page
Other Repository
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-gravit-gevp-06
Individual Submission                                        A. Konviser
Internet-Draft                                       Gravit Open Network
Intended status: Informational                             5 August 2026
Expires: 6 February 2027

             Gravit Epistemic Verification Protocol (GEVP)
                          draft-gravit-gevp-06

Abstract

   GEVP defines minimal protocol for epistemic convergence.  Renamed
   from VCP to avoid collision with draft-kamimura-scitt-vcp.  Invariant
   C_manip > C_val*2.0 as engineering heuristic.  Theta 0.73 RECOMMENDED
   pinned 7755f53.  Architecture stable per
   https://github.com/GravitOpenNetwork/gravit-canon.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 6 February 2027.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Konviser                 Expires 6 February 2027                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                    GEVP                       August 2026

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Epistemic State Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Protocol Data Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   5.  Persistence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   7.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   9.  Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   10. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Appendix A.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

1.  Introduction

   Gravit open network for verifiable knowledge transformations.
   Stable.  Future is implementations.

   GEVP defines ESM RAW->VALIDATED->VERIFIED->COMMITTED, verification
   types, persistence MAY Ledger IPFS GSS DB Archive, bindings separate.

2.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   Invariant C_manip > C_val*2.0 measurement.

3.  Epistemic State Machine

   States RAW VALIDATED VERIFIED COMMITTED explicit logged.

4.  Protocol Data Types

   Artifact id hash SHA3-256 claim provenance signatures optional.
   Record artifact-id verifier-id theta 0.73 result timestamp.
   Convergence h>0.7 f<0.3.

5.  Persistence

   MAY not MUST.  Ledger IPFS GSS DB Archive.

Konviser                 Expires 6 February 2027                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft                    GEVP                       August 2026

6.  Security Considerations

   Replay hash nonce.  Sybil cost model.  No PII.  Signatures OPTIONAL.

7.  Privacy Considerations

   Content MAY encrypted, provenance MAY redacted.

8.  IANA Considerations

   No IANA actions.

9.  Implementation Status

   MVR 0.1.0-mvr https://github.com/GravitOpenNetwork/gravit-canon SHA
   7755f53 TPR 93.4 FPR 0.4 theta 0.73 RECOMMENDED.

10.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", May 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Appendix A.  Acknowledgments

   Contributors Canon Final v1.1

Author's Address

   Alex Konviser
   Gravit Open Network
   Email: ietf@gravit.space

Konviser                 Expires 6 February 2027                [Page 3]