%% You should probably cite draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-03 instead of this revision. @techreport{gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-00, number = {draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement/00/}, author = {Hannes Gredler and Shane Amante and Tom Scholl and Luay Jalil}, title = {{Advertising MPLS labels in OSPF}}, pagetotal = 15, year = 2013, month = apr, day = 13, abstract = {Historically MPLS label distribution was driven by protocols like LDP, RSVP and LBGP. All of those protocols are session oriented. In order to obtain label binding for a given destination FEC from a given router one needs first to establish an LDP/RSVP/LBGP session with that router. Advertising MPLS labels in IGPs advertisement {[}I-D.gredler-rtgwg-igp- label-advertisement{]} describes several use cases where utilizing the flooding machinery of link-state protocols for MPLS label distribution allows to obtain the binding without requiring to establish an LDP/RSVP/LBGP session with that router. This document describes the protocol extension to distribute MPLS labels by the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 protocol.}, }