Comparison of different proposals for ACE
draft-greevenbosch-ace-comparison-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bert Greevenbosch , ana.hedanping@huawei.com , Ruinan Sun | ||
| Last updated | 2015-06-19 (Latest revision 2014-12-16) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document investigates the different solutions in the ACE working group. It highlights both similarities and differences. In addition, it provides a security analysis for the different solutions. Note that the views and comments in this document are solely based on its authors' interpretation, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the authors of the discussed solutions.
Authors
Bert Greevenbosch
ana.hedanping@huawei.com
Ruinan Sun
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)