Interoperability Procedures for BGP Routes with Color
draft-haas-idr-bgp-diffract-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(idr WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Jeffrey Haas | ||
| Last updated | 2023-02-20 (Latest revision 2022-08-19) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | Susan Hares | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2022-10-14 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | shares@ndzh.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
"BGP Routes with Color" have become a topic of interest in the IDR Working Group. The authors of the various proposals have many things in mind to solve with them, how a color might be used, and the operational model for their solution. In general, the solutions share some core properties: Routes for an IP endpoint, that have a domain-wide semantic element to differentiate forwarding (often called a color), and appropriate state to enable that differentiated forwarding. Examples of the technologies enabling differentiated forwarding include MPLS and Segment Routing. This document examines two of the current proposals - BGP Color-Aware Routing, and BGP Classful Transport - and proposes mechanisms to permit them to interoperate.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)