Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names
draft-hakala-urn-nbn-rfc3188bis-02

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

I support Ben's DISCUSS.

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

I support Ben's DISCUSS. I appreciate that the authors want to tell national libraries what to do, but I don't think it's appropriate to do in the IETF stream.

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

Thanks for resolving my DISCUSS point.

The current version still has some lower case instances of "must", "should" and "may", but does not use the RFC 8174 boilerplate. Please fix one or the other.

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

Thank you for the discussion and document updates; my DISCUSS points have been addressed.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

Support Ben's DISCUSS.