Considerations for AI Agent Communication and Networking in Enterprise
draft-han-agent-comm-enterprise-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mengyao Han , Han Zhengxin , Tao He , Ran Pang | ||
| Last updated | 2026-03-15 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-han-agent-comm-enterprise-00
Network Working Group M. Han, Ed.
Internet-Draft Z. Han, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track T. He
Expires: 16 September 2026 R. Pang
China Unicom
15 March 2026
Considerations for AI Agent Communication and Networking in Enterprise
draft-han-agent-comm-enterprise-00
Abstract
This document focuses on enterprise scenarios, investigating key
technologies including agent identification and registration,
capability discovery, efficient communication, and secure
collaboration. It proposes an agent identifier and semantic routing
mechanism to achieve trusted access and efficient collaboration among
heterogeneous agents, providing a technical path for campus-level
multi-agent cooperation.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 16 September 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. AI Agent Protocol heterogeneity and interoperability
barriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. Massive Agent Connection and Addressing . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3. Performance, Reliability and QoS Guarantee . . . . . . . 3
3.4. Trustworthy Access and Permission Control . . . . . . . . 3
4. Requirements of Agent Communication and Networking in
Enterprise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Requirements for AI Agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Requirements for Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.3. Requirements for Agent Gateway . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Potential Key Technologies for Network Infrastructure . . . . 4
5.1. Agent Service Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.2. Agent Service Bearer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.3. Agent ID and Skill Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.4. Token/Agent-aware Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Potential Key Technologies for AI Agent . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Potential Key Technologies for AI Agent Gateway . . . . . . . 6
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
10. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
Artificial intelligence is evolving from a model-dominated stage
toward autonomous and collaborative agents. Constructing network
infrastructure that supports efficient and secure agent collaboration
has become critical. To address the core challenges of large-scale
multi-agent collaboration in enterprise digital transformation, this
paper focuses on enterprise and campus scenarios and proposes an
agent private network architecture centered on the Agent Gateway as
the core device. It investigates a key technical system covering
agent identification and registration, capability discovery,
efficient communication, and secure collaboration, and innovatively
proposes an IPv6 address-based agent identifier and semantic routing
mechanism. Based on the Agent Gateway, this architecture achieves
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
trusted access, capability discovery, and efficient collaboration
among heterogeneous agents through synergy between network-layer and
application-layer capabilities, providing a technical reference and
practical approach for enterprise and campus-level agent
collaboration.
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
3. Problem Statement
3.1. AI Agent Protocol heterogeneity and interoperability barriers
There are various types of devices, platforms, and applications
within the AI agents. Different agents vary in resources and
supported protocols (e.g., ACP, A2A, ANP, etc.)., so adaptation and
protocol conversion are required for agents' communication.
3.2. Massive Agent Connection and Addressing
The number of agents in the enterprise (including robots, sensors,
digital humans, edge AI units, etc.) can reach the million-level
scale. Traditional IP addressing and service discovery mechanisms
(such as DNS and static configuration) are unable to support dynamic
registration, real-time discovery, and high-concurrency connections,
which leads to low addressing accuracy and high communication
latency.
3.3. Performance, Reliability and QoS Guarantee
AI agent services (such as real-time control, video analysis, and
emergency response) have stringent requirements for low latency, high
reliability, and deterministic QoS. However, the best-effort
transmission mode of traditional networks fails to meet these strict
demands, which easily gives rise to issues such as transmission
delay, jitter, packet loss, and congestion collapse.
3.4. Trustworthy Access and Permission Control
During the cross-domain or cross-system communication of agents,
there is a lack of unified identity authentication, fine-grained
permission control, and behavior auditing mechanisms. This brings
about potential security risks.
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
4. Requirements of Agent Communication and Networking in Enterprise
4.1. Requirements for AI Agent
Agent Identity Identification & Discovery: Distinguish agents from
real users, integrate semantic understanding and addressing to match
business needs with corresponding agents. Heterogeneous
Compatibility: Different agents vary in resources and supported
protocols, so adaptation and protocol conversion are required for
agents communication.
4.2. Requirements for Network
Efficient Agent Communication: For agent interaction, consider
network reachability, QoS guarantee, and differentiated SLA services.
Due to high pressure in peer-to-peer collaboration among multiple
agents, convergence is needed to enable hierarchical communication.
Agent Scheduling & Management: Realize agent scheduling within and
across enterprise campus; unify orchestration of network resources
and agent services to align network and business. Security &
Privacy: Implement access management and permission control to
enhance security.
4.3. Requirements for Agent Gateway
As the core device of the enterprise agent private network, the agent
gateway integrates the reliable transmission capability of
communication gateways and the cognitive decision-making
characteristics of agents. It acts as the connection center, policy
enforcer, and security guardian, supporting trusted access, efficient
communication, and collaborative operations among agents.
[I-D.han-rtgwg-agent-gateway-intercomm-framework] proposes the Agent
Gateway Intercommunication Framework, with Application Service Layer,
Orchestration & Control Layer, Agent Connectivity Layer, Network
Communication Layer.
5. Potential Key Technologies for Network Infrastructure
This section proposes several potential technologies, which are
mainly used for agent communication and networking in enterprise
scenarios.
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
5.1. Agent Service Awareness
Agent Service Type Identification: Identifies services including
real-time control, video analysis, semantic interaction, data
synchronization, and emergency commands. QoS Requirement Awareness:
Recognizes differentiated service demands for latency, reliability,
and throughput, and automatically matches appropriate network
scheduling policies. Traffic Feature and Behavior Awareness:
Perceives agent communication patterns such as request-response,
publish-subscribe, multicast, broadcast, and continuous streaming to
optimize forwarding paths and resource allocation.
5.2. Agent Service Bearer
Deterministic Forwarding and Low-Latency Transmission: Provides
deterministic transmission with bandwidth reservation, low jitter,
and low packet loss for real-time control and emergency agent
services, guaranteeing SLAs for critical services. High-Concurrency
Connection Bearer: Supports concurrent access of massive agents, long
connection keepalive, and lightweight signaling interaction, solving
resource bottlenecks associated with million-scale agent access.
5.3. Agent ID and Skill Identification
Globally Unique Agent Identifier: Defines a unified, routable, and
cross-domain interoperable Agent ID to replace traditional IP
addresses as the core identity of agents. Standardized Description
of Capabilities/Skills: Performs structured and parsable skill
modeling for functions provided by agents, including perception,
reasoning, execution, collaboration, and scheduling. ID and Skill
Registration and Publication: Supports automatic registration of an
agent's ID, attributes, skills, location, and status, forming a
global directory service.
5.4. Token/Agent-aware Routing
Token-aware Routing: Forwards the first token and critical tokens
with high priority to reduce first-packet latency. Combined with
token importance classification, differentiated QoS is achieved.
Agent-aware Routing: Performs routing based on Agent ID, Skill, and
intent; automatically selects the optimal service provider according
to task objectives, capability requirements, and load status;
supports cross-domain, cross-gateway, and cross-enterprise agent
addressing. It realizes routing by capability, forwarding by intent
and supports automatic collaboration among multiple agents.
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
6. Potential Key Technologies for AI Agent
TBD.
7. Potential Key Technologies for AI Agent Gateway
TBD.
8. Security Considerations
TBD.
9. IANA Considerations
TBD.
10. Informative References
[I-D.han-rtgwg-agent-gateway-intercomm-framework]
Zhengxin, H., Ruan, Z., Han, M., Yan, J., He, T., and R.
Pang, "Agent Gateway Intercommunication Framework", Work
in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-han-rtgwg-agent-
gateway-intercomm-framework-01, 30 January 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-han-rtgwg-
agent-gateway-intercomm-framework-01>.
[I-D.zgsgl-dispatch-a2a-requirements-enterprise]
Zhang, L., Geng, N., Shang, X., Gao, Q., Li, Z., and J.
Ge, "Enhanced A2A Requirements for Agents Collobration in
Enterprise", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
zgsgl-dispatch-a2a-requirements-enterprise-01, 27 November
2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zgsgl-
dispatch-a2a-requirements-enterprise-01>.
[I-D.pang-agents-networking-scenarios]
Pang, R., Han, M., Liu, B., Zhang, L., Gao, Q., Geng, N.,
Shang, X., and Z. Li, "Agents Networking Scenarios in
Enterprise and Broadband Networks", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-pang-agents-networking-scenarios-00,
6 November 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-pang-agents-networking-scenarios-00>.
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Considerations for AI Agent Communicatio March 2026
[I-D.zlgsgl-rtgwg-agents-networking-framework]
Zhang, L., Liu, B., Geng, N., Shang, X., Gao, Q., and Z.
Li, "Agents Networking Framework for Enterprise and
Broadband", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
zlgsgl-rtgwg-agents-networking-framework-00, 3 November
2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zlgsgl-
rtgwg-agents-networking-framework-00>.
Authors' Addresses
Mengyao Han (editor)
China Unicom
Beijing
China
Email: hanmy12@chinaunicom.cn
Zhengxin Han (editor)
China Unicom
Beijing
China
Email: hanzx21@chinaunicom.cn
Tao He
China Unicom
Beijing
China
Email: het21@chinaunicom.cn
Ran Pang
China Unicom
Beijing
China
Email: pangran@chinaunicom.cn
Han, et al. Expires 16 September 2026 [Page 7]