Evaluation of using SIP or an independent protocol for CLUE messaging
draft-hansen-clue-protocol-choices-evaluation-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Hansen , Dr. Allyn Romanow | ||
| Last updated | 2012-05-20 (Latest revision 2011-11-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of using SIP or an independent protocol for conveying CLUE messages/
Authors
Robert Hansen
Dr. Allyn Romanow
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)