Skip to main content

Security Considerations for RFC5011 Publishers
draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-04

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (dnsop WG)
Authors Wes Hardaker , Warren "Ace" Kumari
Last updated 2017-03-29 (Latest revision 2017-02-17)
Replaced by draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations
Stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats
Expired & archived
Stream WG state Adopted by a WG
Document shepherd Tim Wicinski
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This document describes the math behind the minimum time-length that a DNS zone publisher must wait before using a new DNSKEY to sign records when supporting the RFC5011 rollover strategies.

Authors

Wes Hardaker
Warren "Ace" Kumari

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)