PKEX
draft-harkins-pkex-01
The information below is for an old version of the document |
Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (individual)
|
|
Author |
|
Dan Harkins
|
|
Last updated |
|
2016-10-31
|
|
Stream |
|
(None)
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
Stream |
Stream state |
|
(No stream defined) |
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
RFC Editor Note |
|
(None)
|
IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
Internet Research Task Force Harkins
Internet-Draft HP Enterprise
Intended status: Informational October 31, 2016
Expires: May 4, 2017
PKEX
draft-harkins-pkex-01
Abstract
This memo describes a password-authenticated protocol to allow two
devices to exchange "raw" (uncertified) public keys and establish
trust that the keys belong to their respective identities.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 4, 2017.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Harkins Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Public Key Exchange October 2016
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Cryptographic Primitives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Protocol Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. Exchange Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. Commit/Reveal Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Appendix A. Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Introduction
Many authenticated key exchange protocols allow for authentication
using uncertified, or "raw", public keys. Usually these
specifications-- e.g. [RFC7250] for TLS and [RFC7670] for IKEv2--
assume keys are exchanged in some out-of-band mechanism.
[RFC7250] further states that "the main security challenge [to using
'raw' public keys] is how to associate the public key with a specific
entity. Without a secure binding between identifier and key, the
protocol will be vulnerable to man-in-the- middle attacks."
The Public Key Exchange (PKEX) is designed to fill that gap: it
establishs a secure binding between exchanged public keys and
identifiers, it provides proof-of-possession of the exchanged public
keys to each peer, and it enables the establishment of trust in
public keys that can subsequently be used to faccilitate
authentication in other authentication and key exchange protocols.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Harkins Expires May 4, 2017 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Public Key Exchange October 2016
1.2. Notation
This memo describes a cryptographic exchange using sets of elements
called groups. Groups can be either traditional finite field or can
be based on elliptic curves. The public keys exchanged by PKEX are
elements in a group. Elements in groups are denoted in upper-case
and scalar values are denoted with lower-case. The generator of the
Show full document text