Requirements for CoAP End-To-End Security
draft-hartke-core-e2e-security-reqs-00

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Göran Selander  , Francesca Palombini  , Klaus Hartke  , Ludwig Seitz 
Last updated 2016-03-19
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
CoRE Working Group                                           G. Selander
Internet-Draft                                              F. Palombini
Intended status: Informational                               Ericsson AB
Expires: September 20, 2016                                    K. Hartke
                                                 Universitaet Bremen TZI
                                                                L. Seitz
                                                     SICS Swedish ICT AB
                                                          March 19, 2016

               Requirements for CoAP End-To-End Security
                 draft-hartke-core-e2e-security-reqs-00

Abstract

   This document analyses threats to CoAP message exchanges traversing
   proxies and derives the security requirements for mitigating those
   threats.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 20, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of

Selander, et al.       Expires September 20, 2016               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft  Requirements for CoAP End-To-End Security     March 2016

   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Scope and Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Scenarios, Threats and Security Requirements  . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  One Request - One Response  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
       3.1.1.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.1.2.  Security Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.1.3.  Threat Analysis and Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       3.1.4.  Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     3.2.  One Request - Multiple Responses  . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       3.2.1.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       3.2.2.  Security Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
       3.2.3.  Threat Analysis and Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . .  16
       3.2.4.  Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     3.3.  Multiple Requests - One Response  . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
       3.3.1.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
       3.3.2.  Security Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
       3.3.3.  Threat Analysis and Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . .  20
       3.3.4.  Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
     3.4.  Multiple Requests - Multiple Responses: Observe . . . . .  25
       3.4.1.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
       3.4.2.  Security Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
       3.4.3.  Threat Analysis and Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . .  27
       3.4.4.  Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
     3.5.  Multiple Requests - Multiple Responses: Publish-Subscribe  28
       3.5.1.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
       3.5.2.  Security Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
       3.5.3.  Threat Analysis and Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . .  30
       3.5.4.  Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  36
Show full document text