Experiences from IPv6-Only Networks with Transition Technologies in the WIDE Camp Spring 2012
draft-hazeyama-widecamp-ipv6-only-experience-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Hiroaki Hazeyama , Ruri Hiromi , Tomohiro Ishihara , Osamu Nakamura | ||
| Last updated | 2012-09-13 (Latest revision 2012-03-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document reports and discusses issues on IPv6 only networks and IPv4/IPv6 transition technologies through our experiences on the 2nd experiment on the WIDE camp. The second experiment was held from March 4th to March 8th, 2012. We tried to live in commercial IPv6 networks with four kinds of IPv4/IPv6 transition technologies, DNS64/ NAT64, 4RD, 464XLAT and SA46T. In this -01.txt aims to report results of the 2nd experiment and to share issues / problems on the IPv4 / IPv6 transition that we met.
Authors
Hiroaki Hazeyama
Ruri Hiromi
Tomohiro Ishihara
Osamu Nakamura
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)