References from draft-hc-lsr-sr-proxy-fw
These dependencies are extracted using heuristics looking for strings with particular prefixes. Notably, this means that references to I-Ds by title only are not reflected here. If it's really important, please inspect the documents' references sections directly.
| Document | Title | Status | Type | Downref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding |
SR-TE Path Midpoint Restoration
References Referenced by |
informatively references | ||
| draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy |
Segment Routing Policy Architecture
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | informatively references | |
| RFC 2119 |
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
References Referenced by |
Best Current Practice | normatively references | |
| RFC 5226 |
Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
References Referenced by |
Best Current Practice | normatively references | |
| RFC 5250 |
The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 7356 |
IS-IS Flooding Scope Link State PDUs (LSPs)
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 7684 |
OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 7770 |
Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router Capabilities
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 8402 |
Segment Routing Architecture
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | informatively references | |
| RFC 8665 |
OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references | |
| RFC 8667 |
IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing
References Referenced by |
Proposed Standard | normatively references |