Registries for Web Authentication (WebAuthn)
draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-10

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Benjamin Kaduk Yes

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Erik Kline No Objection

Martin Duke No Objection

Murray Kucherawy (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2020-05-19 for -08)
Thanks for the BCP 14 fix.

Looks like these haven't been answered, so I'm leaving them open for possible follow-up:

Section 2:
* Is there a compelling reason to force a particular URL onto IANA?

Section 2.1:
* "Attestation statement format identifiers are case sensitive.  Attestation statement format identifiers may not ... " can be simply "Attestation statement format identifiers are case sensitive and may not ..."

Section 2.1.1:
* The list of field names in this section and in 2.2.1 are hanging and not really separated from their definitions.  I suggest putting back the "o" bullets and following the names by colons, just to make it clear.

Robert Wilton No Objection

Comment (2020-05-18 for -07)
Looks fine to me, but I'm not really an expert on IANA sections yet ...

My only comment is that I also found "USASCII" strange, and probably "ASCII" (listed here https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt) might be better.

Regards,
Rob

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Comment (2020-05-19 for -07)
No email
send info
Thanks for this document to enable work in W3C.

To echo what Murray already noted, Per Section 2, why the specific URL for the IANA registry?

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2020-05-20 for -08)
s/IANA will direct any incoming requests/IANA will direct anyone making incoming requests/

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2020-05-19 for -08)
For both registries, you say, “The expert(s) will clearly identify any issues which cause a registration to be refused.”  You don’t, however, give any guidance about what such issues might be, and it would be useful to give some — consider a time in the future when there are new experts who were not around when this stuff was set up.  This is not a DISCUSS, so if you really have nothing to say I won’t block on it.  But please do consider whether there’s any useful advice to give about what issues might be appropriate “no” material... and that issues explicitly might not.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -08)
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2020-06-02)
Thanks for addressing my issue.