Proposal for Canonical and Other Formats for RFCs
draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Paul E. Hoffman | ||
| Last updated | 2013-01-13 (Latest revision 2012-07-12) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-03.txt
Abstract
This document proposes a new, XML-based canonical format for RFCs that explicitly allows external art as a normative part of the RFC. If the RFC Editor chooses this format, they will also publish non- canonical versions of RFCs in order to accomodate the largest target audience of readers. Having a simple, stable canonical format and a varying number of non-canonical formats that can change over time allows the RFC Editor to add useful formats, particularly in HTML, that can keep up with the needs of all RFC readers.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)