%% You should probably cite draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-03 instead of this revision.
@techreport{hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-00,
    number =    {draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others/00/},
    author =    {Paul E. Hoffman},
    title =     {{Proposal for Canonical and Other Formats for RFCs}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2012,
    month =     may,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {This document proposes a modernized text-based canonical format for RFCs that explicitly allows external art as a normative part of the RFC. If the RFC Editor chooses this format, they will also publish non-canonical versions of RFCs in order to accomodate the largest target audience of readers. Having a simple, stable canonical format and a varying number of non-canonical formats that can change over time allows the RFC Editor to add useful formats, particularly in HTML, that can keep up with the needs of all RFC readers.},
}