Protocol Independent Multicast DR Load Balancing
draft-hou-pim-drlb-00

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2012-04-18 (latest revision 2011-10-14)
Replaced by draft-ietf-pim-drlb
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pim-drlb
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hou-pim-drlb-00.txt

Abstract

On a multi-access network such as an Ethernet, one of the PIM routers is elected as a Designated Routers (DR). The PIM DR has two roles in the PIM protocol. On the first hop network, the PIM DR is responsible for registering an active source to the RP if the group is operated in PIM SM. On the last hop network, the PIM DR is responsible for tracking local multicast listeners and forwarding traffic to these listeners if the group is operated in PIM SM/SSM/DM. In this document, we propose a modification to the PIM protocol that allows multiple of these last hop routers to be selected so that the forwarding load can be distributed to and handled among these routers. A router responsible for forwarding for a particular group is called a Group Designated Router (GDR).

Authors

Yiqun Cai (ycai@cisco.com)
Sri Vallepalli (svallepa@cisco.com)
Heidi Ou (hou@cisco.com)
Andy Green (andy.da.green@bt.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)