Object Identifier Registry for the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

(Richard Barnes) Yes

(Stephen Farrell) Yes

Comment (2013-11-18 for -00)
No email
send info
Just minor suggestions, feel free to ignore:

- General: Maybe say that changing these OIDs would
have a bad effect on interop, since there are some
folks who don't seem to get that?

- section 3: Do you mean the expert should only
accept stuff that'd have been ok with some historical
charter for the smime wg? "Strongly related" seems
somewhat vague. Given the very broad range of
existing OIDs, what would not fit? Would some more
guidance help the expert?

(Sean Turner) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2013-11-21 for -00)
No email
send info
There is, however, a good comment from Suresh Krishnan on his Gen-ART review. Please make sure it is handled before we pass the document to the RFC Editor.

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2013-11-20 for -00)
No email
send info
I have no objection but I note that according to 5226:
            The required documentation and review
            criteria for use by the Designated Expert should be provided
            when defining the registry.
This document gives the review criteria (thanks) but is silent on "documentation". Possibly silence means no documentation is needed, but it would be nice to make that explicit.

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection