Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-09

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2006-06-07 for -)
No email
send info
This comment is related to the IESG discussion about references style. This document seems to propose a third style in what concerns references to RFC documents. for example a reference to RFC 2119 is not labeled as [RFC2119] or [3], but as [STDWORDS]. Moreover, the RFC numbers are not sorted, as it seems to be the current practices within the Normative References or Informative References sections. I know that we avoid having too many rules, and that we do not have consensus about a recommended style for references, still I find this confusing.

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse ( for -)
No email
send info