Tracker vs. DHT Performance Comparison for P2P Streaming
draft-hu-ppsp-tracker-dht-performance-comparison-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Yan Hu , Yong Xia | ||
| Last updated | 2009-10-25 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The draft makes performance analysis in two kinds of resource exchange and discovery methods, tracker based and DHT based architectures in P2P streaming. Our analysis shows that centralized tracker solution for resource discovery (and chunk lookup) has much shorter response time than highly distributed DHT approach.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)