Evaluation of Transition Mechanisms for Unmanaged Networks
draft-huitema-ngtrans-unmaneval-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Christian Huitema | ||
| Last updated | 2002-11-07 (Latest revision 2002-09-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In a companion paper we defined the 'unmanaged networks' scope, which typically correspond to home networks or small office networks, and the requirements for IPv6 transition mechanism in that scope. We start from this analysis and evaluate here the suitability of mechanisms defined in the NGTRANS working group.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)