Tree/Ring/Meshy VPN tunnel systems
draft-hummel-ppvpn-tunnel-systems-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Heinrich K. Hummel | ||
| Last updated | 2001-07-16 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Version 01 is a significant redesign. Exclusive full mesh (EFM) intersite tunneling per VPN is considered as overkill. Options for optimizations are discussed and compared: a) Shared full mesh (SFM) b) Exclusive partial mesh per VPN (EPM) c) Shared partial mesh (SPM)
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)