OAuth 2.0 Proof-of-Possession (PoP) Security Architecture
draft-hunt-oauth-pop-architecture-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Phil Hunt , Justin Richer , William Mills , Prateek Mishra , Hannes Tschofenig | ||
| Last updated | 2014-07-15 (Latest revision 2014-06-26) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Kathleen Moriarty | ||
| Send notices to | oauth-chairs@ietf.org |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The OAuth 2.0 bearer token specification, as defined in RFC 6750, allows any party in possession of a bearer token (a "bearer") to get access to the associated resources (without demonstrating possession of a cryptographic key). To prevent misuse, bearer tokens must to be protected from disclosure in transit and at rest. Some scenarios demand additional security protection whereby a client needs to demonstrate possession of cryptographic keying material when accessing a protected resource. This document motivates the development of the OAuth 2.0 proof-of-possession security mechanism.
Authors
Phil Hunt
Justin Richer
William Mills
Prateek Mishra
Hannes Tschofenig
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)