Skip to main content

DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements
draft-iab-2870bis-03

The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7720.
Authors Marc Blanchet , Lars-Johan Liman
Last updated 2018-07-18 (Latest revision 2015-09-24)
Replaces draft-blanchet-iab-2870bis
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Best Current Practice
Formats
Reviews
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Became RFC 7720 (Best Current Practice)
Action Holders
(None)
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD Jari Arkko
Send notices to housley@vigilsec.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net
IANA IANA review state Version Changed - Review Needed
IANA action state No IANA Actions
draft-iab-2870bis-03
Network Working Group                                        M. Blanchet
Internet-Draft                                                  Viagenie
Obsoletes: 2870 (if approved)                                 L-J. Liman
Intended status: Best Current Practice                            Netnod
Expires: March 27, 2016                               September 24, 2015

       DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements
                        draft-iab-2870bis-03.txt

Abstract

   The DNS Root Name service is a critical part of the Internet
   architecture.  The protocol and deployment requirements expected to
   be implemented for the DNS root name service are defined in this
   document.  Operational requirements are out of scope.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 27, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft       Root Name Service Requirements       September 2015

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  RFC 2870 as Historic  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Protocol Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Deployment Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   7.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   [RFC2870] discusses protocol and operational requirements for root
   name servers for Internet's domain name system(DNS) protocol
   [RFC1035].  Since its publication, both protocol and operational
   requirements have evolved.  It makes more sense now to separate the
   two sets of requirements into two separate documents.  The
   operational requirements are defined in [RSSAC-001].  This document
   defines the protocol requirements and some deployment requirements.

   The root servers are authoritative servers of the unique [RFC2826]
   root zone (".")[ROOTZONE].  They currently also serve the root-
   servers.net zone.  Some also serve the zone for the .arpa top-level
   domain[ARPAZONE].  This document describes the external interface of
   the root name servers from a protocol viewpoint of the service.  It
   specifies basic requirements for the Internet that DNS clients meet
   when interacting with a root name service over the public Internet.

   The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,
   SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
   document, are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119].

1.1.  RFC 2870 as Historic

   This document obsoletes and reclassifies [RFC2870] as Historic.

   This document and [RSSAC-001] together functionally replace
   [RFC2870].

2.  Protocol Requirements

   This section describes the minimum high-level protocol requirements.
   Operative details are documented in [RSSAC-001] and implementation is
   left to the operators of the root name service.

   The root name service:

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft       Root Name Service Requirements       September 2015

      MUST implement core DNS [RFC1035] and clarifications to the DNS
      [RFC2181].

      MUST support IPv4[RFC0791] and IPv6[RFC2460] transport of DNS
      queries and responses.

      MUST support UDP[RFC0768] and TCP[RFC0793] transport of DNS
      queries and responses.

      MUST generate checksums when sending UDP datagrams and MUST verify
      checksums when receiving UDP datagrams containing a non-zero
      checksum.

      MUST implement DNSSEC[RFC4035], as an authoritative name service.

      MUST implement EDNS(0)[RFC6891].

3.  Deployment Requirements

   The root name service:

      MUST answer queries from any entity conforming to [RFC1122] with a
      valid IP address.

      MUST serve the unique [RFC2826] root zone[ROOTZONE].

4.  Security Considerations

   This document does not specify a new protocol.  However, the root
   name service is a key component of the Internet architecture and play
   a key role into the overall security of the Internet[RFC2826].
   Specific security considerations on the DNS protocols are discussed
   in their respective specifications.  The security considerations on
   the operational side of the root name servers are discussed in
   [RSSAC-001].

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no action for IANA.

6.  Acknowledgements

   Some text was taken from [RFC2870].  The editors of this document
   would like to sincerely thank the following individuals for valuable
   contributions to the text: Andrew Sullivan, Simon Perreault, Jean-
   Philippe Dionne, Dave Thaler, Russ Housley, Alissa Cooper, Joe Abley,
   Joao Damas, Daniel Karrenberg, Jacques Latour, Eliot Lear, Bill

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft       Root Name Service Requirements       September 2015

   Manning, David Conrad, Paul Hoffman, Terry Manderson, Jari Arkko,
   Mark Andrews.

7.  Informative References

   [ARPAZONE]
              Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), , ".ARPA Zone
              Management", <http://www.iana.org/domains/arpa>.

   [RFC0768]  Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.

   [RFC0791]  Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.

   [RFC0793]  Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7,
              RFC 793, DOI 10.17487/RFC0793, September 1981,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc793>.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,
              November 1987, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.

   [RFC1122]  Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
              Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC1122, October 1989,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1122>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC2181]  Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Clarifications to the DNS
              Specification", RFC 2181, DOI 10.17487/RFC2181, July 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2181>.

   [RFC2460]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
              (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460,
              December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460>.

   [RFC2826]  Internet Architecture Board, "IAB Technical Comment on the
              Unique DNS Root", RFC 2826, DOI 10.17487/RFC2826, May
              2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2826>.

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft       Root Name Service Requirements       September 2015

   [RFC2870]  Bush, R., Karrenberg, D., Kosters, M., and R. Plzak, "Root
              Name Server Operational Requirements", BCP 40, RFC 2870,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2870, June 2000,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2870>.

   [RFC3172]  Huston, G., Ed., "Management Guidelines & Operational
              Requirements for the Address and Routing Parameter Area
              Domain ("arpa")", BCP 52, RFC 3172, DOI 10.17487/RFC3172,
              September 2001, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3172>.

   [RFC4035]  Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
              Rose, "Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security
              Extensions", RFC 4035, DOI 10.17487/RFC4035, March 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4035>.

   [RFC6891]  Damas, J., Graff, M., and P. Vixie, "Extension Mechanisms
              for DNS (EDNS(0))", STD 75, RFC 6891,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6891, April 2013,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6891>.

   [ROOTZONE]
              "Root Zone", <ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/root.zone>.

   [RSSAC-001]
              Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), , "Service
              Expectations of Root Servers", November 2014,
              <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-001-
              draft-20nov14-en.pdf>.

Authors' Addresses

   Marc Blanchet
   Viagenie
   246 Aberdeen
   Quebec, QC  G1R 2E1
   Canada

   Email: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca
   URI:   http://viagenie.ca

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft       Root Name Service Requirements       September 2015

   Lars-Johan Liman
   Netnod Internet Exchange
   Box 30194
   SE-104 25 Stockholm
   Sweden

   Email: liman@netnod.se
   URI:   http://www.netnod.se/

Blanchet & Liman         Expires March 27, 2016                 [Page 6]