Considerations for Selection of Techniques for NAT Traversal
draft-iab-nat-traversal-considerations-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
00 | (System) | Notify list changed from leslie@thinkingcat.com, jdrosen@cisco.com, bwijnen@lucent.com to leslie@thinkingcat.com, bwijnen@lucent.com |
|
2006-05-05
|
00 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2006-05-05
|
00 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2006-05-05
|
00 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2006-05-05
|
00 | (System) | State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system |
|
2006-05-05
|
00 | (System) | Document has expired |
|
2006-04-05
|
00 | Ted Hardie | Shepherding AD has been changed to Ted Hardie from Bert Wijnen |
|
2006-02-06
|
00 | (System) | State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system |
|
2005-10-11
|
00 | (System) | This document has been resurrected. |
|
2005-10-09
|
00 | Bert Wijnen | I-D Resurrection was requested by Bert Wijnen |
|
2005-09-02
|
00 | (System) | Document has expired |
|
2005-09-02
|
00 | (System) | State Changes to Dead from AD is watching::Revised ID Needed by system |
|
2005-03-07
|
00 | Bert Wijnen | Revised ID expectd. Status: Revision -> (current) incorporate IAB comments (next) … Revised ID expectd. Status: Revision -> (current) incorporate IAB comments (next) proposed: recommendations and WG liaison (next) Further comments received, and a revision is anticipated. Open questions: Should the document be more prescriptive about recommendations? Should this be something to use to talk to WGs? (next) Plan: Take this document to Behave WG for review. Talk to IESG on this. |
|
2005-03-07
|
00 | Bert Wijnen | Draft Added by Bert Wijnen in state AD is watching |
|
2005-02-13
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-iab-nat-traversal-considerations-00.txt |