DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review
draft-iesg-discuss-criteria-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(iesg)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jon Peterson , Brian E. Carpenter | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2006-02-07) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Brian E. Carpenter | ||
| Send notices to | margaret@thingmagic.com, mankin@psg.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the role of the 'DISCUSS' position in the IESG review process. It gives some guidance on when a DISCUSS should and should not be issued. It also discusses procedures for DISCUSS resolution.
Authors
Jon Peterson
Brian E. Carpenter
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)