%% You should probably cite rfc8928 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-6lo-ap-nd-01, number = {draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd/01/}, author = {Behcet Sarikaya and Pascal Thubert and Mohit Sethi}, title = {{Address Protected Neighbor Discovery for Low-power and Lossy Networks}}, pagetotal = 17, year = 2017, month = may, day = 16, abstract = {This document defines an extension to 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery. This extension is designed for low-power and lossy network environments and it supports multi-hop operation. Nodes supporting this extension compute a Cryptographically Unique Interface ID and associate it with one or more of their Registered Addresses. The Cryptographic ID (Crypto-ID) uniquely identifies the owner of the Registered Address. It is used in place of the EUI-64 address that is specified in RFC 6775. Once an address is registered with a Cryptographic ID, only the owner of that ID can modify the state information of the Registered Address in the 6LR and 6LBR.}, }