Ballot for draft-ietf-6lo-blemesh
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Thank you Catherine Meadows for the SECDIR review.
Thank you for addressing my discuss and comment points!
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.
Hi, thank you for this document, just a minor comment: The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP14 RFC 2119 [RFC2119], RFC 8174 [RFC8174], when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. Strictly, this is not the text from 8174. "NOT RECOMMENDED" is missing.
Hi, Thank you for this document. A couple of minor comments relating to the diagram in 3.2 (figure 2): (1) It wasn't clear to me why the top left node was a 6LR rather than a 6LN. If this is deliberate, it might be worth a sentence to explain the purpose here. (2) I initially found the bubble around the v6 Mesh to be confusing - I thought that it means that all the nodes are interconnected. I'm not sure whether the bubble really helps the diagram, and probably could be removed, of if it is kept, I would suggest adding more space between the bubble line and the mesh network inside so that the bubble line isn't confused as representing links between the nodes. Regards, Rob