%% You should probably cite rfc8096 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-02, number = {draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete/02/}, author = {Bill Fenner (ˢˣˠ)}, title = {{The IPv6-Specific MIB Modules Are Obsolete}}, pagetotal = 65, year = 2016, month = nov, day = 13, abstract = {In 2005-2006, the IPv6 MIB update group published updated versions of the IP-MIB, UDP-MIB, TCP-MIB, and IP-FORWARD-MIB modules, which use the InetAddressType/InetAddress construct to handle IPv4 and IPv6 in the same table. This document contains versions of the obsoleted IPV6-MIB, IPV6-TC, IPV6-ICMP-MIB, IPV6-TCP-MIB, and IPV6-UDP-MIB modules for the purpose of updating MIB module repositories. This document obsoletes RFCs 2452, 2454, 2465, and 2466 (i.e., the RFCs containing these MIBs) and reclassifies them as Historic.}, }