%% You should probably cite rfc8754 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-03, number = {draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header/03/}, author = {Stefano Previdi and Clarence Filsfils and Brian Field and Ida Leung and Jen Linkova and Ebben Aries and Tomoya Kosugi and Éric Vyncke and David Lebrun}, title = {{IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)}}, pagetotal = 29, year = 2017, month = jan, day = 13, abstract = {Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by prepending an SR header to the packet. A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service-based. SR allows to enforce a flow through any path (topological, or application/service based) while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node to the SR domain. Segment Routing can be applied to the IPv6 data plane with the addition of a new type of Routing Extension Header. This draft describes the Segment Routing Extension Header Type and how it is used by SR capable nodes.}, }