Ballot for draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification
Yes
No Objection
No Record
Summary: Needs 5 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Thank you for this well written document.
Hi Adrian and Suresh, The clarifications in the document is needed. Thank you for the effort put into this. The document is well-written. I appreciate that both the abstract ad introduction make it clear what is being updated. I reviewed the document in the past, so I only have very minor comments/nits: # Positioning the updates RFC9800 has the following: This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format, as specified in this document. If we had draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification at the time, we wouldn’t need to update 8754. As both 9800 and this present doc will be listed as updating 8754, I wonder whether we can help readers to position the two updates. For example, would it be useful to consider an update to 9800 that would be simply: OLD: This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format, as specified in this document. NEW: This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format, as specified in this document. This use is consistent with RFC-to-be-draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification. # nit, Section 1 OLD: The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754] an IPv6 extension header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments and any additional processing to be performed. NEW: The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754], an IPv6 extension header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments and any additional processing to be performed. Or NEW2: The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754]. The SRH is an IPv6 extension header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments and any additional processing to be performed. # Indicate objective of what in this part CURRENT: The SRH is processed per Section 4 of [RFC8754]. One objective is to determine the value to place in the Destination Address field of the IPv6 packet. # Cite as a reference (1) OLD: The figure in Section 2 of RFC 8754 reads: NEW: The figure in Section 2 of [RFC8754] reads: (2) OLD: In describing the HMAC processing, the text in RFC 8754 NEW: In describing the HMAC processing, the text in [RFC8754] (3) OLD: packet in RFC 8574 reads NEW1: packet in [RFC8574] reads Or NEW2: packet in Section 5.4 of [RFC8574] reads # nits: 128-bit or 128 bits OLD: List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. NEW: List are 128-bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. # nit OLD: List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. NEW: List are 128-bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses. # Expand HMAC OLD: HMAC verification checks NEW: Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC) verification checks Cheers, Med
Thank you for the effort put into this short I-D. I did not see any end-to-end transport topics of concern, and I am happy to see this published. Gorry Fairhurst.