Ballot for draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification

Yes

Éric Vyncke
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Gorry Fairhurst

No Record

Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Ketan Talaulikar
Mahesh Jethanandani
Mike Bishop
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen

Summary: Needs 5 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.

Éric Vyncke
Yes
Gunter Van de Velde
Yes
Comment (2026-05-06) Not sent
Thank you for this well written document.
Jim Guichard
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
Yes
Comment (2026-04-25) Sent
Hi Adrian and Suresh, 

The clarifications in the document is needed. Thank you for the effort put into this.

The document is well-written. I appreciate that both the abstract ad introduction make it clear what is being updated. 

I reviewed the document in the past, so I only have very minor comments/nits:

# Positioning the updates

RFC9800 has the following:

   This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in
   the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as
   specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format,
   as specified in this document.

If we had draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification at the time, we wouldn’t need to update 8754. As both 9800 and this present doc will be listed as updating 8754, I wonder whether we can help readers to position the two updates. For example, would it be useful to consider an update to 9800 that would be simply:

OLD:
   This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in
   the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as
   specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format,
   as specified in this document.

NEW:
   This document updates RFC 8754 by allowing a Segment List entry in
   the Segment Routing Header (SRH) to be either an IPv6 address, as
   specified in RFC 8754, or a REPLACE-CSID container in packed format,
   as specified in this document. This use is consistent with RFC-to-be-draft-ietf-6man-sidlist-clarification.

# nit, Section 1

OLD:
   The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the
   use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754] an IPv6 extension
   header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments
   and any additional processing to be performed.

NEW:
   The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the
   use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754], an IPv6 extension
   header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments
   and any additional processing to be performed.

Or

NEW2:
   The mechanisms to achieve Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) include the
   use of the Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754]. The SRH is an IPv6 extension
   header that includes a SID list indicating the sequence of segments
   and any additional processing to be performed.

# Indicate objective of what in this part

CURRENT: 
   The SRH is processed per Section 4 of [RFC8754].  One objective is to
   determine the value to place in the Destination Address field of the
   IPv6 packet.  

# Cite as a reference

(1)

OLD: The figure in Section 2 of RFC 8754 reads:

NEW: The figure in Section 2 of [RFC8754] reads:

(2)

OLD: In describing the HMAC processing, the text in RFC 8754

NEW: In describing the HMAC processing, the text in [RFC8754]

(3)

OLD: packet in RFC 8574 reads

NEW1: packet in [RFC8574] reads

Or

NEW2: packet in Section 5.4 of [RFC8574] reads


# nits: 128-bit or 128 bits

OLD: List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses.

NEW: List are 128-bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses.

# nit

OLD: List are 128 bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses.

NEW: List are 128-bit entries, but not necessarily IPv6 addresses.

# Expand HMAC

OLD: HMAC verification checks

NEW: Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC) verification checks

Cheers,
Med
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Comment (2026-04-29) Not sent
Thank you for the effort put into this short I-D. I did not see any end-to-end transport topics of concern, and I am happy to see this published.

Gorry Fairhurst.
Andy Newton
No Record
Charles Eckel
No Record
Christopher Inacio
No Record
Deb Cooley
No Record
Ketan Talaulikar
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Mike Bishop
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Tommy Jensen
No Record