A RADIUS Attribute, Binding, Profiles, Name Identifier Format, and Confirmation Methods for the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)
draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-14
Yes
(Stephen Farrell)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
(Ben Campbell)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -12)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-01-06 for -13)
Unknown
Thanks for answering my questions about extending the SAML spec. The use of normative MAYs in Section 9 does not seem appropriate.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-01-06 for -13)
Unknown
Because abfab-arch defines the terms "Client", "Relying Party", and
"Identity Provider", I think abfab-arch should be a normative reference.
-- Section 3 --
The RADIUS SAML binding defined in Section 4 of this document uses
two attributes to convey SAML assertions and protocol messages
respectively [OASIS.saml-core-2.0-os]
Nit: "respectively" is out of place here, and should be removed. You
would only use "respectively" if you named the two attributes ("...uses
two attributes, SAML-Assertion and SAML-Protocol, to convey SAML
assertions and protocol messages, respectively.").
-- Section 7.3.5 --
If issued by the Identity Provider, the Relying Party MUST process
the <samlp:Response> message and any enclosed assertion elements as
described in [OASIS.saml-core-2.0-os]
"If issued" is dangling, and makes it look like the Relying Party is
issued by the Identity Provider.
NEW
If a <samlp:Response> message is issued by the Identity Provider,
the Relying Party MUST process that message and any enclosed
assertion elements as described in [OASIS.saml-core-2.0-os]
END
-- Section 11.2 --
Thank you; this section is well done.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-01-05 for -13)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06287.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown