Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Profile for Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE)
draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-15
Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> Cc: kaduk@mit.edu, ietf@augustcellars.com, ace-chairs@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize@ietf.org, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ace@ietf.org Subject: Protocol Action: 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Profile for Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-11.txt) The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Profile for Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE)' (draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-11.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benjamin Kaduk and Roman Danyliw. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize/
Technical Summary Relevant content can frequently be found in the abstract and/or introduction of the document. If not, this may be an indication that there are deficiencies in the abstract or introduction. Working Group Summary Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting? For example, was there controversy about particular points or were there decisions where the consensus was particularly rough? Document Quality Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that merit special mention as having done a thorough review, e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review, what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type Review, on what date was the request posted? Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Who is the Responsible Area Director? If the document requires IANA experts(s), insert 'The IANA Expert(s) for the registries in this document are <TO BE ADDED BY THE AD>.' IRTF Note (Insert IRTF Note here or remove section) IESG Note (Insert IESG Note here or remove section) IANA Note (Insert IANA Note here or remove section)