Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Renewal Information (ARI) Extension
draft-ietf-acme-ari-08
Yes
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mahesh Jethanandani
(Erik Kline)
(John Scudder)
(Orie Steele)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Deb Cooley
Yes
Éric Vyncke
(was Discuss)
No Objection
Comment
(2025-02-26)
Sent
Thanks for addressing my previous blocking DISCUSS points, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/39amfomGbjKAMTDeAP_Q7mEpg54/ The points below were and are still non-blocking but I sincerely think that the document readability will be improved if addressed. The text sent by Aaron about these 2 points would be beneficial to the readers/implementers if included in a -09. The choice is really up to the author at this point. ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Section 4.1 Also in this section, should the note about prefixing a "00" when the serial number is a negative number be more than a simple note but normative ? Or if this is per default in ACME, adding a reference ? ### Section 4.2 Is the first `Conforming clients SHOULD provide this URL to their operator` correct ? I would assume that this JSON reply is sent by the ACME server and not by the client.
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2025-01-08 for -07)
Not sent
Thank you to Susan Hares for the GENART review.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2025-02-27)
Sent
Thanks for the discussion. It was very informative. I've updated my ballot to Yes.h
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2025-02-27)
Sent for earlier
Thanks for fixing the IANA stuff. == [previous comments] == I support Eric's DISCUSS. Why is the SHOULD in Section 4.3 only a SHOULD? When would you legitimately do something other than what it says? I have the same question about the SHOULDs in Sections 4.3.2, 4.3.3, and 5.
Orie Steele Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2025-01-07 for -07)
Not sent
Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Michael Tüxen for the TSVART review.