%% You should probably cite rfc8657 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-acme-caa-03, number = {draft-ietf-acme-caa-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-caa/03/}, author = {Hugo Landau}, title = {{CAA Record Extensions for Account URI and ACME Method Binding}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2017, month = aug, day = 30, abstract = {The CAA DNS record allows a domain to communicate issuance policy to CAs, but only allows a domain to define policy with CA-level granularity. However, the CAA specification also provides facilities for extension to admit more granular, CA-specific policy. This specification defines two such parameters, one allowing specific accounts of a CA to be identified by URI and one allowing specific methods of domain control validation as defined by the ACME protocol to be required.}, }