Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-18

Yes

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline

No Objection

Jim Guichard
Mike Bishop
Mohamed Boucadair
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 17 and is now closed.

Deb Cooley
Yes
Erik Kline
Yes
Comment (2025-05-31 for -17) Sent 
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-17
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Nits

### S2

* "The ACME server SHALL" ->
  "An ACME server supporting this specification SHALL", perhaps

### S3.2

* "expected to encountered" -> "expected to be encountered"
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mike Bishop
No Objection
Comment (2025-06-04) Sent 
Thank you for clearly describing the experiment and desired learnings.

===NITS FOLLOW===

Section 1, "which used to represent" => "which is used to represent" (or also say what it represents now, I suppose)
Mohamed Boucadair
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2025-06-04) Sent 
Hi Brian, 

Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS/COMMENTs [1].

Cheers,
Med

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/5tHfafB2k__EZKNKp9xc_NjS-Lo/
Paul Wouters
(was Abstain) No Objection
Comment (2025-06-06) Sent 
Thanks to Brian Sipos for the additional clarifications. I have updated my ballot to No Objection.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-06-05) Sent 
Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review.

Noting here that -18 of this document, updated June 4, appears to have text changes to address the feedback provided by the DE leading to an "IANA - Not OK" status.  This document should not advance without this status being cleared.