Ballot for draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
+1 on EKR's comments.
Martin Thomson raised some good comments, that are worth a reply: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08-artart-telechat-thomson-2017-04-05/
Another +1 to ekr's point on fingerprinting.
I agree with the point Eric raises.
I agree with Ekr
Thanks for your response to the SecDir review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/IeteBTg_rl9JNarNecvNAgjocZo And adding the security consideration text from Eric's discuss.