Skip to main content

Multicast Control Extensions for the Access Node Control Protocol (ANCP)
draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-16

Yes

(Ted Lemon)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.

Ted Lemon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -14) Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-02-05 for -14) Unknown
I'm impressed with the quality and readability of this document.

It would be interesting to hear the answer to Brian's 2nd point, but that interest in no way causes me to object to the publication of this document.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-02-04 for -14) Unknown
As mentioned by Mehmet during his OPS DIR review:
The document is well-written and thorough concerning the usual requirements for protocol extension specifications.

I don't see any real issues from the operations and management pov.

Though, it might be in general interesting for such protocol specifications to have a discussion on, e.g.:
- configuration parameter and useful default values for buffering, timer values, etc.
- protocol scalability and
- whether the protocol extensions increase the traffic load, which can be an issue for multicast especially if dynamic sharing of bandwidth between unicast and multicast video traffic on each access line is done.

The document has 1 nit comment:

  -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'PIMreg'
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2014-02-25) Unknown
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-02-06 for -14) Unknown
There were some changes agreed from the secdir review [1]
but I'm not sure if they were (all) done. In particular,
point (6) about AAA security seems not to be reflected in
the current draft.

   [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04539.html
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -14) Unknown